5 Guests Online

Highlights

dismiss menu

Need assistance? Go to our Web Portal Site Map : PAC PORTAL MAP

Need to learn more? Go to our Educational Page : PAC EDUCATIONAL PAGE

   Click Here to Talk to a Representative

Parts Menu  Intro   Part 1    Part 2    Part 3    Part 4    Part 5    Part 6    Part 7  
Part 5 | The Expatriation Act

And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues. -- Revelation 18:4

"I admire PAC's readiness to inform and assist souls out of the New World."

--Tupper Saussy, author of Rulers of Evil

The Expatriation Act

The day before the Fourteenth Amendment was announced purportedly ratified (i.e., it was not lawfully ratified), an act was passed by a RUMP United States Congress. This particular act is entitled Public Law; 15 United States Statutes at Large, Chapter 249, pps 223-224 (1868). Most people refer to this Act as the "Expatriation Act." The Act is as follows:

An Act concerning the Rights of American Citizens in foreign States, Approved, July 27, 1868

PREAMBLE - Rights of American citizens in foreign states. WHEREAS the right of expatriation is a natural and inherent right of all people, indispensable to the enjoyment of the rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; and whereas in the recognition of this principle this government has freely received emigrants from all nations, and invested them with the rights of citizenship; and whereas it is claimed that such American citizens, with their descendants, are subjects of foreign states, owing allegiance to the governments thereof; and whereas it is necessary to the maintenance of public peace that this claim of foreign allegiance should be promptly and finally disavowed.

An Act concerning the Rights of American Citizens in foreign States, Approved, July 27, 1868

SECTION I - Right of expatriation declared. THEREFORE, Be it enacted by the Senate of the and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That any declaration, instruction, opinion, order, or decision of any officers of this government which denies, restricts, impairs, or questions the right of expatriation, is hereby declared inconsistent with the fundamental principles of this government.

An Act concerning the Rights of American Citizens in foreign States, Approved, July 27, 1868

SECTION II - Protection to naturalized citizens in foreign states. And it is further enacted, That all naturalized citizens of the United States, while in foreign states, shall be entitled to, and shall receive from this government, the same protection of persons and property that is accorded to native born citizens in like situations and circumstances.

An Act concerning the Rights of American Citizens in foreign States, Approved, July 27, 1868

SECTION III - Release of citizens imprisoned by foreign governments demanded. And it is further enacted, That whenever it shall be made known to the President that any citizen of the United States has been unjustly deprived of his liberty by or under the authority of any foreign government, it shall be the duty of the President forthwith to demand of that government the reasons for such imprisonment, and if it appears to be wrongful and in the violation of the rights of American citizenship, the President shall forthwith demand the release of such citizen, and if the release so demanded is unreasonably delayed or refused, it shall be the duty of the President to use such means, not amounting to acts of war, as he may think necessary and proper to obtain or effectuate such release, and all the facts and proceedings relative thereto shall as soon as practicable be communicated by the President to Congress.

The "Expatriation Act" Explained

The Preamble—which has no effect of law—is stealthily stating that the state governments were going to be usurped by the 14th Amendment political mandates. Mind you: The 14th Amendment was set into action the day after said Act was passed. The purported reason was to keep "peace" under the totalitarian style socialist governmental system of which has been in the works since just after the so-called Civil War. Most importantly, the Preamble of the "Expatriation Act" is simply stating: Because the United States gave such people the right of citizenship, the people that were not natural born Americans should—NOT MUST—give up their political allegiance to the lawful several state governments of their states of national domicile.

In view thereof: Because Congress has limited constitutional control:

Because Congress did not have the authority over people before the Constitution was enacted: Could Congress—RUMP or otherwise—make this statement about any American that was natural born, which would include all his descendants?

Answer—NO. It has no authority to do so.

Could the aforementioned people—along with all others that were not pre-constitution descendants of natural born Americans—be tricked into giving up their de jure (rightful) political allegiance by participating in an alternate body politic set forth by an operation of law under the 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution?

Answer—YES.

Section 1. Section 1 of the Act—being the most important section as a matter of law—basically states that one can remove himself or herself from any body politic (i.e., political systems), country and/or nation (especially false ones) as it is a natural right of every man and woman.

Section 2 and 3. These sections are just Congressional babbling that sets forth that the new "citizens of the United States"—i.e., denizens (all US citizens, or "citizens of the United States," are naturalized—native or naturalized—because there is no "Federal Nation")—are going to be protected as if they were natural born [native] or of a "de jure" character. To further enforce this fact, there are United States Attorney General opinions that reflect the language of those 2 sections that were written during the Civil War.

For more legal information on the illegality of the 14th Amendment, see the Law Reviews in Part 6.

In Summary. The essence of allegiance is being protected by the government of a nation. In American law, one owes his primary fidelity to his county or nation. In effect the Fourteenth Amendment has (had) pulled all people of the several republics of the Union under the protection of the United States, not their states. The United States then was demanding allegiance from such people; the above act is evidence of such. This is not inherent in the original constitutional system.

Below is some evidence that is found in American Jurisprudence—which is fundamentally the final word on American law—that sets forth prima facie evidence that the United States does not have the authority over the states and the people that make-up such states:

rebels. A term loosely but incorrectly applied to the Confederate
Forces engaged in the Civil War. 30 Am J Rev ed lnsurr § 2

This—among other fabrications—have programmed people in the United States into believing that the United States has sovereignty over the states and accordingly the people of such states.

As the Fourteenth Amendment creates a body politic de facto and a FALSE nation, this instant Act is pertinent to one just saying no to the governmental system as it exists in America. In other words: It is a remedy to remove oneself from that system.And, it should be noted that this Act does not point out that such citizens—i.e., denizens if you will—are going to be "Subject To" the law of Congress and that all their natural rights are going to be taken away for acting in sedition to the system of law that is inherent in the original constitutional system, again see PAC Perspectives for more...

In a final note: There are some people in the movement that profess and/or believe that the term "citizen of the United States" and "American citizen" are different in their meaning. In rebuttal of this, one should understand that a derivative of the term "American citizen" is used in Section 3 synonymously with the term from Section 2 noted as "citizen of the United States";wherefore they are the same. Not to mention the past regulations on the term that state that they are the same thing. /1\



Parts Menu  Intro   Part 1    Part 2    Part 3    Part 4    Part 5    Part 6    Part 7  
Page Hits : 6924 Faq Site Map Contact Us Tell a Friend PAC Groups Login
Copyright © , People’s Awareness Coalition, All Rights Reserved